The energy requirements would be stupid, but a sufficiently advanced civilization could do it. It's a preemptive strike, done maybe tens of thousands of years in advance. Say, a sufficiently advanced civilization that wants to conquer the galaxy doesn't want the competition, so they monitor the night sky for signals of other advanced species, then accelerates a massive asteroid towards their planet, at stupid speeds. It's unpredictable, virtually unstoppable, and terrifying. Note the big glowing weakspots - a ship with no radiators has little choice but to shut it's reactor down to avoid melting itself into slag.Įxactly. Here's a nice picture of a typical gunship in orbit above Mars. Close range is rarely reached with both sides still functional. At longer ranges (1000s of km), nuclear missiles tend to be used, while at medium ranges (10s to 100s of km) railguns are used. Also, while guns typically fire 'dumb' projectiles like in the Expanse, 'smart' rounds with guidance and/or warheads are also available.īut broadly speaking it's similar to the Expanse ships tend to be cylindrical with engines at the base, and engagements generally involve two ships/fleets going head-on at eachother, or one chasing the other, with some evasive maneuvering thrown into the mix. Point defense against missiles/drones tends to use coilguns rather than chemical guns, but chemical guns are still an option, as are lasers. There's also a bit more variety in weapon choices, with lasers and drone swarms being options on the table. The videogame 'Children of a Dead Earth' reached a similar conclusion, with the main difference being that the propulsion/power source tech is less advanced/more realistic, and so the ships have radiators to dump waste heat and also typically only pull gees while in combat, and otherwise travel using classical orbital trajectories to conserve fuel between fights. And, in my experience, if you're going to experience both the books and the series, it's always best to do the series/movie first, as the books will still be very enjoyable, rather than the other way around. The world and character building are phenomenal. They are some of the best "hard Sci Fi" I have ever read. NOTE: I highly recommend both the books and the series. SPOILER: In the books they also show how devastating it could be to hurl asteroid chunks at Earth from space. PDC's - Point Defense Cannons are utilized to shoot down incoming missiles and nukes, but cannot protect against the smaller rounds from "rail guns" used at close quitters combat (within a few kilometers). The engine is at the "bottom" of the skyscraper like structure and there are floors starting above the engine and going up towards the cockpit area, so that you can walk around during travel at 1G. The crew strap into "crash-couches" for high G maneuvers, and are pumped with BP meds and amphetamines to stay awake and alive during those maneuvers. These are ships built like a sky-scraper, that create livable 1G environments by traveling halfway to a destination at 1G, flipping, and traveling the rest of the way at 1G by slowing down the second half of the way, or any combination therein (often accelerating to a certain speed under high G burns then traveling the rest of half the distance at 0 G). I can't think of any movie or series that takes this likelihood into account. One aspect that impressed me, and that I didn't expect, is that ship-to-ship combat was all done at vast distances a few kilometers being incredibly and unusually close. The Expanse book series (and the Prime series does well, too) does a compelling look at ship-to-ship combat in space. What would be the best way to land ground troups on a planet? You could consider dropping „planes“ carrying the troups into orbit? Also how would you track an enemy spaceship and how would you try to hide yourself? What do you guys think of this.ģ.Conquering a planet. I imagine something similar to submarines fighting, with additional predicaments like heat management. How could you be able to protect yourself from this kind of thing? Perhaps something like a missile defense system? Idk I‘d like your opinions on that.įighting in Space Assuming you managed to protect yourself from just plain missiles or you actually plan to send down a land invasion force, you would probably have to engage in space. Just launch a rod of metal at another planet fast enough and you have essentially a nuke. I think this is probably the easiest, but also most destructive way to fight. I have multiple scenarios I’d like your opinion on. Obviously it would be a very slow and long ranged endeavor. When I say space warfare, I’m refering to multiple parties separated by space, like two planetary colonies fighting. I‘ve been asking myself that for quite some time now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |